← Full guide: Solar Product vs Performance Warranty: Build a Claim That Matches the Promise

Route the claim to the party that owns the failure

For “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”, installer: ask for site inspection and fault isolation under the workmanship/service contract.

Start here

For “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”, installer: ask for site inspection and fault isolation under the workmanship/service contract.

What applies to this exact problem

  1. Installer: ask for site inspection and fault isolation under the workmanship/service contract.
  2. Manufacturer: open the product or performance claim with the required serials and test evidence.
  3. Inverter service network: use the device error code, logs and model-specific procedure.
  4. Insurer: use the policy notice route for a covered external event; preserve damaged parts if instructed.

Send one chronology with installation date, first symptom, data gap, inspections and requested remedy. Ask each party to state whether it accepts responsibility, which clause it relies on, what additional evidence it needs, who bears each incidental cost and the next response date. A vague “system is underperforming” ticket invites vague answers.

Check these first

  • Installer: ask for site inspection and fault isolation under the workmanship/service contract.
  • Manufacturer: open the product or performance claim with the required serials and test evidence.
  • Inverter service network: use the device error code, logs and model-specific procedure.

Fix it in this order

  1. Installer: ask for site inspection and fault isolation under the workmanship/service contract.
  2. Manufacturer: open the product or performance claim with the required serials and test evidence.
  3. Inverter service network: use the device error code, logs and model-specific procedure.
  4. Insurer: use the policy notice route for a covered external event; preserve damaged parts if instructed.
  5. Send one chronology with installation date, first symptom, data gap, inspections and requested remedy.
  6. Ask each party to state whether it accepts responsibility, which clause it relies on, what additional evidence it needs, who bears each incidental cost and the next response date.

Evidence to keep

  • Signed quote and scope — keep it with the evidence for “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”.
  • Module/inverter serials and warranty — keep it with the evidence for “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”.
  • DISCOM/portal application IDs — keep it with the evidence for “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”.
  • Generation data, photos, and installer tickets — keep it with the evidence for “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”.

Do not make it harder

  • Paying the final amount before checking agreed milestones For “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”, that can hide whether the underlying issue is actually resolved.
  • Assuming low generation is automatically a bad panel For “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”, that can hide whether the underlying issue is actually resolved.
  • Treating installer completion as DISCOM/subsidy completion For “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”, that can hide whether the underlying issue is actually resolved.

How you know it is fixed

  • The defect or claim has a written technical decision tied to the applicable terms for “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”.
  • Repair, replacement, payment, or denial is complete and documented for “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”.

If this still isn't resolved

  1. Installer/vendor grievance State the unresolved issue explicitly: “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”.
  2. DISCOM/portal grievance route State the unresolved issue explicitly: “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”.
  3. Consumer forum or other official remedy where appropriate State the unresolved issue explicitly: “Route the claim to the party that owns the failure”.

Parent-guide references

These references support the parent guide and escalation context. Verify provider-, model-, policy-, or jurisdiction-specific details before an irreversible step.

Need the complete context?

This page solves one branch. The parent guide covers the full decision, edge cases, alternatives, and related checks.

Open the full guide